Legislature(2011 - 2012)CAPITOL 106
02/28/2012 03:00 PM House HEALTH & SOCIAL SERVICES
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| Confirmation Hearing(s): State Medical Board | |
| HB310 | |
| HB218 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | HB 310 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| *+ | HB 218 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 218-PRESCRIPTION DRUG SPECIALTY TIERS
3:57:39 PM
CHAIR KELLER announced that the final order of business would be
HOUSE BILL NO. 218, "An Act prohibiting an insurer from using a
drug formulary system of specialty tiers under certain
circumstances."
3:58:08 PM
JANET OGAN, Staff, Representative Wes Keller, Alaska State
Legislature, as aide to the House Health and Social Services
Standing Committee, introduced proposed HB 218 on behalf of the
committee. She read the sponsor statement:
Specialty medications used to treat complex chronic
diseases continue to be the fastest growing segments
of overall drug spend. While traditional drug spend
slowed to an increase of only 1.5 percent in 2008,
specialty drug spend continued its steady climb,
increasing 15.4 percent.
House Bill 218 protects patients with critical
illnesses from sudden changes in their drug treatment
and therapy protocols which may un-expectantly deprive
the patient from critical therapies due to the
inability to pay for the drug or sufficient time to
plan alternative financial or therapeutic strategies.
Currently, insurance companies can change their
reimbursement policies with only a 30 day notice,
often forcing the patient to absorb thousands of
dollars of unexpected costs for expensive specialty
drug therapy. By extending the notification period
the savings for the patient will be absorbed by rest
of the policy holders on the plan. This may give the
patient additional time to explore other options which
may allow for a transition to a more affordable plan
with similar therapeutic results.
Without these specialty drugs quality of life
deteriorates and long term health care costs may
increase. Additionally, cost savings may be achieved
by exploring options like management through specialty
pharmacies that use drug-utilization monitoring
specifically designed for hard to manage conditions.
4:00:35 PM
CHAIR KELLER clarified that proposed HB 218 was a House Health
and Social Services Standing Committee bill, and that it would
behoove the committee to understand the bill. He declared that,
as pharmaceuticals were getting more expensive, Medicare was
using a tier system to adjust the co-pays in an attempt to
manage the rising costs. He reported that the average tier IV
specialty drugs now cost $2500 each month, and that these price
increases had been accompanied with only a 30 day notice. He
pointed out that the proposed bill had a zero fiscal note, with
the additional cost passed to the insurers.
4:03:12 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON asked why there was a request for 90 days,
if 30 days was the status quo.
MS. OGAN replied that 90 days was felt to be a fair and adequate
amount of time.
4:03:54 PM
REPRESENTATIVE HERRON, referring to a letter from Jack McRae,
Senior Vice President of Premera [Included in members' packets],
read: "This change will inflate costs for specialty drugs and
will increase overall healthcare premiums for Alaskans." He
asked for this to be "expanded in explanation," in writing, for
the committee.
4:05:02 PM
CHAIR KELLER declared that he had no intent to move the bill
today, as he only wanted to hear a discussion.
4:05:17 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KERTTULA asked if it were different drugs that
caused the prices to rise so quickly.
MS. OGAN replied that these were specialty drugs for auto immune
diseases and chronic conditions. She relayed that some people
were paying a co-insurance of 30 percent of the retail cost.
She explained the difference between co-pay, which was a flat
payment, and co-insurance, which was a percentage of cost.
4:07:05 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KERTTULA stated that although she liked the idea
of giving notice, she had concerns for the availability of the
older drug.
4:07:52 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON, referring to the aforementioned letter
from Mr. McRae, directed attention to page 2, "Less than 3
percent of private health plan members use specialty
pharmaceuticals; however, these members account for 25 - 30
percent of total private payer medical costs." He acknowledged
that the medical costs to the State of Alaska retirement system
for Alaskan retirees prior to 65 years of age, accounted for 75
percent of the unfunded liability. He asked if proposed HB 218
would increase the unfunded liability to the state retirement
plan, and if so, to what extent.
MS. OGAN replied that she would research that information.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON pointed out that any proposed legislation
which affected benefits to the retirement system was required in
statute to have a fiscal note. He asked if this tier system was
just for new drugs, and, opining that this was on a drug by drug
basis, asked for clarification as to who this would impact.
MS. OGAN relayed that discussion with drug manufacturers would
determine if these drugs should be tiered. She clarified that
some of these were not new drugs, but that the expense was now
being passed on to the consumers.
4:11:38 PM
CHAIR KELLER affirmed that he had also presumed that this cost
increase was for new drugs. He expressed the need for caution
in identifying any of the groups as "good guys" or "bad guys."
4:13:04 PM
CHAIR KELLER passed the gavel to Vice Chair Dick.
4:13:21 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MILLER asked for the definition of "a drug
formulary system."
MS. OGAN replied that she would research that definition.
4:13:56 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON offered his belief that drugs needed to go
through a public vetting process prior to designation. He
questioned the length of time necessary for a drug to be listed
on a formulary.
4:15:42 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MILLER asked if the proposed bill could include a
required notification to patients that a change was pending.
MS. OGAN replied that the suggestion should be explored.
4:17:08 PM
LEONARD SORRIN, Attorney, Director Of Congressional and
Legislative Affairs, Premera Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alaska,
stated that Premera Blue Cross was in opposition to HB 218. He
stated that Premera understood the financial burden of specialty
drugs on health care consumers and on the health care system.
He noted that this increase in drug cost was a key driver to the
increase in health care costs over the next few years. He
opined that the health care system would be "struggling for a
number of years to figure out how best to finance these sorts of
drugs, how best to provide them." He stated that this
discussion would need to include the pharmaceutical industry.
He directed attention to the aforementioned letter from Mr.
McRae, which outlined the Premera concerns with proposed HB 218.
He pointed out that Premera currently supplied a written
notification regarding any policy change 30 days in advance of
the change in terms. He said that he was not aware of any
complaints or concerns from members. He cited that the market
standard for notification was 30 days, and that the shift to 90
days for notification would inflate the costs for specialty
drugs and would increase the overall health care premiums for
all Alaskans. He detailed that the longer a health plan needed
to wait until a change was instituted, the higher the cost to
the system, which would increase premiums for the entire system.
4:19:57 PM
VICE CHAIR DICK asked for any suggestions to proposed HB 218
that would be workable for Premera.
4:20:15 PM
MR. SORRIN replied that this was a complicated set of issues.
He offered his belief that this "requires a broader based effort
to consider how the system at large ought to respond to these
types of costs and ought to finance these types of costs."
4:21:02 PM
VICE CHAIR DICK asked that any suggestions for solutions be sent
to the committee.
MR. SORRIN agreed to respond.
4:22:15 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KERTTULA asked Mr. Sorrin if he worked with
Premera and the State of Alaska health plan.
MR. SORRIN replied that he was with Premera Blue Cross Blue
Shield of Alaska, which, until a few years ago, had administered
the Alaska employee benefit plan. He shared that his company
was still very involved with health plans in the Alaska market.
4:23:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KERTTULA said that, for the record, she had
complained about this problem. She asked for the kinds of drugs
being referenced.
MR. SORRIN said that he could not provide names of drugs, but
that the legislative intent of proposed HB 218 was for
biological drugs which provided treatment for acute and chronic
illnesses. He pointed out that these drugs were extremely
expensive, and were, generally, new drugs. He stated that there
was a crisis for how to finance and spread the cost for these
expensive drugs.
4:25:23 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KERTTULA asked for a breakdown to the cost of the
drugs, to include the cost of research, the profit, and the cost
to the customer.
4:25:49 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON opined that Premera had managed the State
of Alaska health care during the establishment of the tiered
formulary. He asked if these current tiers were the same tiers
which the State of Alaska had used, or an in-house tier of drugs
which Premera had designated for its insured patients.
MR. SORRIN replied that these tiers were developed by Premera
for its insured and self-insured accounts. He declared that the
vast majority of the self-insured accounts used the Premera
formulary. He reported that Premera was presently transitioning
to a value based formulary, which assessed value to the overall
holistic value of a drug compared with another drug. He
explained that this value would include the medical costs
foregone by the use of one drug over another. He noted that the
prescription drug formulary process was in a continual evolution
for adaptation to the pharmaceutical marketplace.
4:27:34 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON asked if drugs designed for specific body
chemistry or genetics were categorically specified for a tier,
and was it necessary for the drugs to be released before
entering the tier process.
MR. SORRIN, in response, explained that a drug, subsequent to
its approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), was
reviewed by a health plan to determine its placement on the
formulary. He stated that disease specific drugs were generally
the biological drugs included in the specialty listing.
4:29:11 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON asked about the time necessary for
placement of a drug in the formulary.
MR. SORRIN replied that he did not know how long after FDA
approval that the process began, but deciding where to place it
on the formulary was a relatively quick process. He reported
that Premera had a pharmacy and therapeutic committee, comprised
of outside pharmaceutical medical experts and ethical experts,
which met regularly for assessment and placement of drugs.
4:30:31 PM
BRENDA ROBERTSON shared a personal experience for the dramatic
increase in the cost of a drug. She stated that her husband,
Steven, had been taking copaxone to treat multiple sclerosis
(MS) for 10 years. She reported that, in addition to their
monthly insurance premium, they would now have to pay an
additional $1000 each month for the copaxone. She remarked:
we thought that we had done all the right things
because we were paying our insurance premiums
faithfully every month, so we wouldn't have to deal
with a surprising financial burden. And yet, here we
were facing this unbelievable expense.
MS. ROBERTSON conveyed that they had learned to live with the
challenges of MS, never asking for special treatment or
assistance, but had not expected to be penalized for being sick.
She commented: "this practice of specialty tiering
discriminates against the sickest among us and puts their lives
in danger." She pointed out that there was not a generic
alternative drug, all MS drugs were included in a specialty
tier. She stressed "that is unfair and it is unconscionable" to
raise the cost by several thousand percent, with no notice, for
a lifesaving medication with no generic options. She expressed
her understanding for the need of insurance companies to save
money, but, she stated:
this is not the way. Realizing their savings on the
backs of the most vulnerable Alaskans, the sickest,
the weakest, and yet, generally the ones that are
still getting up every day, pushing through their
hardships, going to work, and contributing to the
state economy, there cannot be anything moral or
ethical about it.
MS. ROBERTSON observed that many states had banned the practice
of specialty tiers, with an additional 16 states enacting
legislation to either ban the specialty tiers, or limit the
annual cost increase to patients. She opined that a result of
drug tiers could be the chronically ill becoming the
responsibility of the state. She stated her support for HB 218,
but she emphasized that the increased costs to patients for
specialty drugs was a bigger problem. She urged the passage of
legislation to ban the specialty tiers, or, at the least, cap
the annual patient payments. She affirmed that many of these
specialty tier drugs were not new drugs.
4:36:48 PM
MS. ROBERTSON, in response to Representative Miller, replied
that the drug was copaxone, and that it was manufactured by TEVA
pharmaceutical.
4:37:38 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KERTTULA expressed that she was outraged,
especially as this was not a new drug.
MS. ROBERTSON, in response to Representative Kerttula, said that
they had been informed of the cost increase by the pharmacy.
She offered her belief that having insurance was supposed to
protect people from this type of financial crisis, and that
people would stop taking the medication if prices increased so
dramatically, because they had no choices.
4:40:11 PM
ROBERT LADA, MD, Providence Alaska Medical Center, stated that
he was a neurologist and a specialist in sleep medicine. He
expressed concern with proposed HB 218. He declared that most
of the MS medications had been released in the early 1990s, and
allowed the patient to have a normal life span and the ability
to work. He pointed out that during the 1990s, the insurance
companies had labeled the MS medications as experimental, and
therefore, most patients could not afford the treatment. In
later years, as insurance coverage was expanded by the insurance
companies, the prices to patients were more affordable. He
established that this tier system would increase the cost to
patients so dramatically that they could only afford the less
effective drugs previously used for treatment in the 1980s,
which would not allow them "to go through life in the best way
possible, with the less amount of the disability and be able to
work." He established that options were limited no matter the
lead time for notification, but that a 90 day notification at
least allowed the opportunity to explore other options.
4:44:25 PM
REPRESENTATIVE KERTTULA asked if the drug prices were also
increasing for existing drugs, and not just new drugs.
DR. LADA replied that all drug prices were increasing, although
there were options for some of the drugs.
4:45:37 PM
VICE CHAIR DICK asked why the cost would increase for a drug
that had no additional research to increase its expense.
DR. LADA explained that it was the insurance coverage that was
being removed and that cost was being transferred to the patient
responsibility.
4:46:50 PM
ANTONIA FIFLIS-FOWLER, Executive Director, Alaska Multiple
Sclerosis Foundation, stated that the foundation supported HB
218. She shared that there had not many treatments when she was
diagnosed with MS 30 years prior. She touted the results from
the new MS drugs, and expressed her agreement with Dr. Lada that
removal of the affordable access for these drugs would be
regressive. She noted that although HB 218 only proposed a
simple notification change, it brought an awareness of the
unfair burden for drug costs to the chronically ill. She
acknowledged that the stress of not knowing whether an increase
in financial obligations was looming would exacerbate the MS
symptoms. She expressed agreement for a ban to the specialty
drug tiers as these tiers were discriminatory toward people with
chronic conditions. She encouraged support for HB 218. In
response to an earlier question from Representative Kerttula,
she listed the other drugs for treatment of MS. In response to
an earlier question from Representative Seaton, she defined
specialty tier IV drugs as "drugs made of proteins from living
cells that are needed to be infused or injected."
4:51:44 PM
VICE CHAIR DICK announced that public testimony would remain
open.
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON suggested assembling information from
other states addressing this issue, in order to better
understand the effects of various actions.
4:52:27 PM
REPRESENTATIVE MILLER emphasized the need for a conversation
about:
the sudden increase in cost or how its formulated
because its somewhere between the manufacturers of a
drug claiming that they have high R&D [research and
development] costs bringing that product to market and
... the costs that insurance companies decide need to
be brought forward. ... It seems that this entire
industry is always profitable, several points ahead of
inflation, year after year after year after year. For
20 or 30 years this has been going on. I have never
been satisfied with knowing what is the true causer of
all this cost increase. I find it constant that the
insurance coverages are less and less, co-pays are
higher or impossible, and I think it's time we start
investigating this all the way down to the very bottom
level. Where is the research starting? Who's paying
for it? What is it really cost? What are the mark-
ups? Where are these people making all the profits?
This has got to be discovered. ... I certainly want
to know these things.
VICE CHAIR DICK expressed appreciation for the work of the
pharmaceutical companies, but affirmed that "there certainly are
some mysteries going on."
4:54:15 PM
REPRESENTATIVE SEATON directed attention to a recent report
about health care costs. He asked for more information about
the costs for infusion drugs in Alaska, relative to the costs in
other western states.
[HB 218 was held over.]